American Journal of Sports Medicine

Jurgen Höher MD, Akihiro Kanamori MD, Jennifer Zeminski MS, Freddie H. Fu MD and Savio L-Y. Woo


Ten cadaveric knees (donor ages 36 to 66 years) were tested at full extension, 15°, 30°, and 90° of flexion under a 134-N anterior tibial load. In each knee, the kinematics as well as in situ force in the graft were compared when the graft was fixed with the tibia in four different positions: full knee extension while the surgeon applied a posterior tibial load (Position 1), 30° of flexion with the tibia at the neutral position of the intact knee (Position 2), 30° of flexion with a 67-N posterior tibial load (Position 3) and 30° of flexion with a 134-N posterior tibial load (Position 4). For positions 1 and 2, the anterior tibial translation and the in situ forces were up to 60% greater and 36% smaller respectively, than that of the intact knee. For Position 3, knee kinematics and in situ forces were closest to those observed in the intact knee. For Position 4, anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased by up to 2 mm and the in situ force increased up to 31 N. These results suggest that the position of the tibia during graft fixation is an important consideration for the biomechanical performance of an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.