Language and Reading References

 

 

 

Basic Reference Texts

 

  1. Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (Eds.). (1999). The neurocognition of language. Oxford Press.

 

  1. Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (Eds.). (2005), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247).  Oxford:  Blackwell.

 

3.     Gernsbacher, M. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.

 

 

Other references

 

  1. Balota, D. A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303-358). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.

 

  1. Berent, I. & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39-72.

 

  1. Berent, Pinker & Shimron (1999). Default nominal inflection in Hebrew: evidence of mental variables. Cognition, 72, 1-44.

 

8.  Bock, K. (1986). Meaning sound and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4, 575-586.

 

9.   Bock, Irwin, Davidson, & Levelt (2003). Minding the clock. JML, 48, 653-686.

 

  1. Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-983). San Diego: Academic Press

 

  1. Boroditsky, L. (2001) Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers� conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1) pp. 1-22.

 

12. Britt, M. A. (1994).  The interaction of referential and argument structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases.  Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 251-283

 

 

13.  Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Garrod, S., & Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 293-314.

 

  1. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.

 

  1. Chomsky, N. (1986).  Knowledge of language:  Its nature, origin, and use.  New York:  Praeger.

 

16. Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (1987). Modularity in sentence comprehension. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

  1. Coltheart, M. Modeling Reading: The Dual-Route Approach. In Snowling & Hulme (2005)

 

  1. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.

 

  1. Cutler, A. & Clifton, C. (1999). A blueprint of the listener. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (chapter 5). Oxford Press.

 

20.  Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.

 

21. Ehri.L. Development of sight word reading: phases and findings. In Snolwing & Hulme (2005)

 

22. F. Ferreira (2003)The misinterpretation of non-canonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164-203

 

  1. Fletcher, C. R. (1994). Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589-607). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Fodor, J. (1983).  The modularity of mind.  Cambridge, MA:  MIT Press

 

  1. Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3-71

 

  1. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.

 

27. Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E. Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

  1.  Frazier, L. (1987).  Sentence processing:  A tutorial review.  In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII:  The psychology of reading.  Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

  1.  Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1990). Referential processing in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores D'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

  1. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building (pp. 167-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

31. Gibson, E. (2000). The Dependency Locality Theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Miyashita, Y., Marantz, A. & O�Neil, W. (Eds.) Image, Language, Brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. pages 95-126.

 

32. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002).  Grounding language in action.  Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565.

 

  1. Glenberg A. M., & Robertson, D.A. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-401.

 

  1. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse Comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.

 

35. Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.

 

36. Hanley, J.R. Learning to read in Chinese. In Snowling & Hulme (2005)

 

  1. Jackendoff, R. (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

  1.  Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shriffin (Eds.), Learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 261-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

  1. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.

 

40. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.

 

  1. Levelt, W. (1999). A Blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (chapter 4). Oxford Press.

 

42. Liberman, A. & Mattingly, I.G. (1985), The Motor theory of Speech Perception Revisited. Cognition, 21, 1-36.

 

 

  1. Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Spoken word recognition: Research and theory. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265-301). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Marcus, G. (1998). Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 243-282.

 

  1. Marcus, G. S., Vijayan, S. B., Rao, & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seventh month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.

 

46.  Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). Against modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

47. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review. In H. Bouma, & D.G. Bouhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 

  1.  McClelland, J. L. (1986).  The case for interactionism in language processing. In In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 3-10). Cambridge, MA:  MIT  Press.

 

  1. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440- 466.

 

  1.  Mitchell, D. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375-409). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1.  MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.

 

52. Nation, K. Children�s reading difficulties. In Snowling & Hulme (2005)

 

  1. Perfetti, C.A. (1990). The cooperative language processors: Semantic influences in an autonomous syntax. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.

 

  1. Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849-894). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Perfetti, C. A. (1999). A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (chapter 6). Oxford Press.

 

56. Perfetti, C.A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3-24.

 

  1. Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Tan, L. H.  (2005). The Lexical Constituency Model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 12(11), 43-59.

 

  1. Plaut, D. Connectionist approaches to reading. In Snowling & Hulme (2005)

 

  1. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.

 

60. Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 779-790.

 

  1.  Rayner, K., & Sereno, S.  C. (1994). Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 57-81). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Rumelhart, D.  & McClelland (1986). On learning the past tense. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2 (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA:  MIT  Press.

 

  1. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming, Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.

 

  1.  Simpson, G. B. (1994). Context and the processing of ambiguous words. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 359-374). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479-515). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

66.  Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)Consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.

 

  1.  Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming, Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.

 

68. Snowling, M.J. & Hulme, C. Learning to read with a language impairment 

 

69. Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324-340.

 

70. Van Berkum, J. Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse.: can we use ERPs to keep track of things? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (2004). The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERPs and beyond. (pp229-270)

 

71. Van Dyke, J.A. & Lewis, R.L. Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. JML, 2003, 49, 285-316

 

 

  1.  Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.

 

  1. van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). San Diego: Academic Press.

 

  1. Warren, T. & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, 85, 79-112

 

75. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H.  (2002).  Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects?  Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.

 

  1.  Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998).  Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 2, 162-185.