Language and Reading
References
Basic Reference Texts
- Brown,
C., & Hagoort, P. (Eds.). (1999). The neurocognition of language. Oxford Press.
- Snowling,
M. J., & Hulme, C. (Eds.). (2005), The science of reading: A
handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Gernsbacher,
M. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
Other references
- Balota,
D. A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to
meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303-358). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Barsalou,
L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22,
577-660.
- Berent,
I. & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence
from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 64,
39-72.
- Berent,
Pinker & Shimron (1999). Default nominal inflection in Hebrew:
evidence of mental variables. Cognition, 72, 1-44.
8. Bock, K. (1986). Meaning sound and
syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4,
575-586.
9. Bock, Irwin,
Davidson, & Levelt (2003). Minding the clock. JML, 48, 653-686.
- Bock,
K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In
M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-983). San Diego: Academic Press
- Boroditsky,
L. (2001) Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers� conceptions
of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1) pp. 1-22.
12.
Britt, M. A. (1994).
The interaction of referential and argument structure in the parsing of
prepositional phrases. Journal
of Memory and Language, 33, 251-283
13. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Garrod,
S., & Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their
limits. Journal of Memory and Language, 31,
293-314.
- Bransford,
J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for
understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
- Chomsky,
N. (1986). Knowledge of
language: Its nature, origin,
and use. New York:
Praeger.
16. Clifton, C., &
Ferreira, F. (1987). Modularity in sentence comprehension. In J. L. Garfield
(Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language
understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Coltheart, M. Modeling Reading: The Dual-Route Approach. In Snowling
& Hulme (2005)
- Coltheart,
M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading
aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological
Review, 100, 589-608.
- Cutler,
A. & Clifton, C. (1999). A blueprint of the listener. In C. Brown
& P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (chapter 5). Oxford Press.
20. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading
activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review,
93, 283-321.
21. Ehri.L. Development of
sight word reading: phases and findings. In Snolwing & Hulme (2005)
22.
F. Ferreira (2003)The misinterpretation of non-canonical
sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164-203
- Fletcher,
C. R. (1994). Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In M. A.
Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589-607). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Fodor,
J. (1983). The modularity
of mind. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press
- Fodor,
J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A
critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3-71
- Foltz,
P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of
textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
27. Forster, K. I. (1979).
Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E.
Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic
studies presented to Merrill Garrett.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention
and performance XII: The
psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Garrod, S., & Sanford, A.
(1990). Referential processing in reading: Focusing on roles and
individuals. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores D'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),
Comprehension processes in reading.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Gernsbacher,
M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building (pp. 167-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
Gibson, E. (2000). The Dependency Locality Theory: a
distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Miyashita, Y., Marantz, A.
& O�Neil, W. (Eds.) Image, Language, Brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. pages
95-126.
32.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565.
- Glenberg
A. M., & Robertson, D.A. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of
high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-401.
- Graesser,
A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse Comprehension.
Annual Review of Psychology, 48,
163-189.
35. Harm, M., &
Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia:
Insights from a connectionist model.
Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
36. Hanley, J.R. Learning to
read in Chinese. In Snowling & Hulme (2005)
- Jackendoff,
R. (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers
construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and
causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shriffin
(Eds.), Learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of
William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 261-278).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Kintsch,
W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: A
construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
40. Landauer, T. K., Foltz,
P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse
Processes,
25,
259-284.
- Levelt,
W. (1999). A Blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort
(Eds.), The neurocognition of language (chapter 4). Oxford Press.
42. Liberman, A. &
Mattingly, I.G. (1985), The Motor theory of Speech Perception Revisited.
Cognition, 21, 1-36.
- Lively,
S. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Spoken word
recognition: Research and theory. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook
of psycholinguistics (pp. 265-301).
San Diego: Academic Press.
- Marcus,
G. (1998). Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology, 37,
243-282.
- Marcus,
G. S., Vijayan, S. B., Rao, & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by
seventh month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.
46. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K.
(1987). Against modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge
representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Marslen-Wilson, W.
(1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review. In
H. Bouma, & D.G. Bouhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of
language processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- McClelland, J. L. (1986). The
case for interactionism in language processing. In In D. E. Rumelhart, J.
L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds). Parallel distributed
processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1:
Foundations (pp. 3-10). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
- McKoon,
G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological
Review, 99, 440- 466.
- Mitchell, D. (1994). Sentence
parsing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375-409). San Diego: Academic Press.
- MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N. J.,
& Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity
resolution. Psychological Review, 101,
676-703.
52. Nation, K. Children�s
reading difficulties. In Snowling & Hulme (2005)
- Perfetti,
C.A. (1990). The cooperative language processors: Semantic influences in
an autonomous syntax. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D'Arcais, & K.
Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
- Perfetti,
C.A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M.A. Gernsbacher
(Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics
(pp. 849-894). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Perfetti,
C. A. (1999). A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort
(Eds.), The neurocognition of language
(chapter 6). Oxford Press.
56. Perfetti, C.A. (2003).
The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1),
3-24.
- Perfetti,
C. A., Liu, Y., Tan, L. H.
(2005). The Lexical Constituency Model: Some implications of
research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological
Review, 12(11), 43-59.
- Plaut, D. Connectionist approaches to reading. In Snowling &
Hulme (2005)
- Plaut,
D.C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996).
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles
in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
60. Rayner, K., &
Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 779-790.
- Rayner, K., & Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye movements in
reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook
of psycholinguistics (pp. 57-81). San
Diego: Academic Press.
- Rumelhart,
D. & McClelland (1986).
On learning the past tense. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the
PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing:
Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2 (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Seidenberg,
M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model
of word recognition and naming, Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
- Simpson, G. B. (1994). Context and
the processing of ambiguous words. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook
of psycholinguistics (pp. 359-374).
San Diego: Academic Press.
- Singer,
M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),
Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.
479-515). San Diego: Academic Press.
66. Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access
during sentence comprehension: (Re)Consideration of context effects. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18,
645-659.
- Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland
J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and
naming, Psychological Review, 96,
523-568.
68. Snowling, M.J. &
Hulme, C. Learning to read with a language impairment
69. Tabossi, P. (1988).
Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal
of Memory and Language, 27, 324-340.
70. Van Berkum, J. Sentence
comprehension in a wider discourse.: can we use ERPs to keep track of things?
In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (2004). The on-line study of sentence
comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERPs and beyond. (pp229-270)
71.
Van Dyke, J.A. & Lewis, R.L. Distinguishing effects of
structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of
recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. JML, 2003, 49, 285-316
- Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F.,
& Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise
of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
- van
den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts:
Inferences and coherence. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Warren,
T. & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on
sentence complexity. Cognition, 85, 79-112
75.
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of
objects? Psychological Science,
13, 168-171.
- Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998). Situation Models in
Language Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 2, 162-185.