Mark S. Strauss, Ph.D            Home   

[left.htm]

Perceptual Development in Infancy

Our knowledge of the world revolves around the ways we interpret sensory information

Much of what we perceive is processed implicitly without our awareness

Yet, is has a major impact on how we process information and ultimately who we are as humans

How do we know what is music or noise

Why do we see certain colors

What do we find attractive

 

 

How do you know what this is?

Historical Debate and Interest

Consider the simple ability to perceive depth

History of Nativist-Empiricist Debate

DeCartes (1638): Humans are born with "natural" laws that can measure the angle of the eyes, e.g., we are built with trigonometric tables in our heads

Nativist-Empiricist Debate

Berkeley (1709):Argured for empiricism: Infants learn depth through feedback from their tactile and motor experiences. They associate eye movements with hand and arm movements.

Touch Teaches Vision!

Nativist-Empiricist Debate

Immanuel Kant (1981): Mind doesn�t rely on experience for meaning but innately organizes sensations into perception

Depth perception emerges too early in life to have been learned

Even adults with limited experience (e.g., handicapped) experience depth

Theoretical Positions

Empiricists/Constructivists: All of perception is learned through active interactions in the world and cultural transmission

Nativists: Perceptual Abilities are all innate

James & Elinore Gibson:

Perception is innate, and infants naturally perceive "affordances" or important environmental information.

Gestalt Psychologist: Perception is learned except for figure/ground distinctions

How to empirically study this?

In the 1960�s Gibson used the visual cliff "Common sense might suggest that the child learns to recognize falling-off places by experience�that is, by falling and hurting himself. But is experience really the teacher? Or is the ability to perceive and avoid a brink part of the child�s original endowment?"

The Visual Cliff

Visual Cliff Research

Gibson concluded: So few infants crossed the "deep" side that it must be innate

Bertenthal and Campos: 2 month olds show heart rate decrease when put on the "deep" side. This suggest they can perceive depth but are not afraid

Fear develops late based on parents and "social referencing"

How do we perceive depth?

Oculomotor Cues

Accomodation and Convergence both begin at approximately two months of age and provide infants with depth information

Both only provide information about close-up distances

How do we perceive depth?

Binocular: Retinal Disparity

Binocular: Retinal Disparity

Binocular: Retinal Disparity

Richard Aslin: Research showing infants 3-D movies while wearing glasses

Infants by 4 to 6 months perceive and use retinal disparity

Probably an innate skill that shows later maturation

How do we perceive depth?

How do you perceive depth

Texture Gradient

Texture decreases with distance

Relative Size

Size decreases with distance and can be compared with known objects

Interposition

Contours of one object partially occlude another object

Shading

Farther away objects appear darker

Pictorial or Monocular Cues

Yonas & Granrud: Studies using infants reaching when objects appear at different distances because of pictorial cues

Sensitivity to these cues emerge around 7 months of age

Are they learned or innate?

Gibson would argue they are affordances that don�t get "triggered" until this age

Uniformity of development suggests this may be true

Perception of Pattern or Figures

How do we perceive figure vs background?

What do you perceive?

How do you know what is figure or ground?

Gestalt School of Perception

Must be innate rules to organize figure from background

Perception of Complete Figures

Subjective Contours Illusion: Infants perceive by 3 to 4 months

What about movement?

Study by Kellman & Spelke