![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |review |
Now as I noted earlier, some genes silenced by
the introduction of transgenes are re-expressed when segregated from the
transgene and in other cases they are not. 1. Transgenes that are readily reactivated upon segregation are generally not methylated and are inactivated post-transcriptionally. This is called post-transcriptional gene silencing or PTGS. 2. Transcription from such genes, as detected by run-on transcription assays, is not inhibited. That is, the phenotypically silenced genes are transcribed, often at high levels, but there is little steady-state RNA accumulation. This means that the silencing occurs by a post-transcriptional mechanism that either destabilizes the RNA or results in its premature truncation. 3. Promoter methylation is generally detected when transgenes are transcriptionally silenced, while post-transcriptionally silenced genes are often methylated in the coding region. 4. There is evidence from Herve Vaucheret�s lab that promoter methylation is required for the mainenance of transcriptional gene silencing, but not its initiation. Having made all these generalizations, I have to remind you that all generalizations, including the present ones, are suspect. Going back a moment to maize and paramutation, what I described for the R locus clearly falls into the category of TGS. But paramutation is likely to involve more than one epigenetic mechanism. Paramutation has also been studied at the maize B locus and found to have quite different properties. In this case, the paramutagenic allele exerts its influence in the F1 heterozygote and methylation has never been detected. What�s common to both is that the interaction between alleles results in a heritable change in gene expression of the paramutable allele. |