![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |review |
A cross-sectional study provides an instantaneous picture of the relationship between the disease or condition of interest and physical activity levels at one point in time. PROS:
�Quick
�Easy
�Cheap
CONS:
�An
association does not prove causality. Therefore, with this study
design, we cannot get information about whether physical inactivity
caused the disease or the disease caused the physical inactivity.
�It
is not possible to assess what effect changing the level of physical
activity participation would have on the disease or condition of
interest.
�
Recommended Reading: Gordis L (2000). Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company. |