![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |review |
PROS:
�Can
establish cause and effect. Through the use of this study design,
investigators are able to determine if physical inactivity lead to the
disease or health outcome of interest.
�Can
directly measure the development of disease or condition of interest in
both those who do and do not participate in physical activity.
CONS:
�Not
a good study design for studying rare diseases or conditions because the
investigators have to wait for individuals to develop the disease or
condition of interest.
�Can
be costly and time-consuming
�Often
requires a large sample size to ensure that enough study participants
will develop the disease or outcome of interest during the course of the
study.
�This
study design is subject to participants dropping out or being loss to
follow-up (can�t be found) because of the lengthy study time.
�
Recommended Reading: Gordis L (2000). Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company.
|