::: about
   ::: news
   ::: links
   ::: giving
   ::: contact

   ::: calendar
   ::: lunchtime
   ::: annual lecture series
   ::: conferences

   ::: visiting fellows
   ::: postdoc fellows
   ::: resident fellows
   ::: associates

   ::: visiting fellowships
   ::: postdoc fellowships
   ::: senior fellowships
   ::: resident fellowships
   ::: associateships

being here
   ::: visiting
   ::: the last donut
   ::: photo album

::: center home >> events >> lunchtime >> 2010-11 >> abstracts

Tuesday, 1 February 2011
In Defence of Structural Realism; or: the “Newman Objection”, what objection?
John Worrall
London School of Economics, Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
12:05 pm, 817R Cathedral of Learning

Abstract:  Following Poincaré, I have defended Structural Realism (SR) in a number of earlier papers.  SR has however been subjected to several criticisms.  Of these the “Newman Objection” is generally regarded as the most fundamental.  Indeed many people regard it as blowing SR entirely out of the water.  I argue that, when properly understood, this is in fact no objection at all, but rather one way of emphasizing exactly what SR says!  In the process I defend the view (to which SR, as I construe it, is committed) that the full cognitive content of any theory is captured by its Ramsey sentence and reject the claim that this involves surrender to instrumentalist empiricism.

Revised 1/24/11 - Copyright 2011