::: about
   ::: news
   ::: links
   ::: giving
   ::: contact

   ::: calendar
   ::: lunchtime
   ::: annual lecture series
   ::: conferences

   ::: visiting fellows
   ::: postdoc fellows
   ::: resident fellows
   ::: associates

   ::: visiting fellowships
   ::: postdoc fellowships
   ::: senior fellowships
   ::: resident fellowships
   ::: associateships

being here
   ::: visiting
   ::: the last donut
   ::: photo album

::: center home >> events >> lunchtime >> 2010-11 >> abstracts

Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Doing Without ‘Theory’:  Towards a More Transparent Philosophy of Science
Peter Vickers, Postdoctoral Fellow (CPS), University of Leeds
12:05 pm, 817R Cathedral of Learning

::: donuts

Abstract: There is some reason to believe that ‘scientific theory’ is a ‘peg’ term: a very general term that is used to refer to a wide range of different phenomena (Needham 1972).  If so, that question so often asked ‘What is a scientific theory?’ is based on a false premise.  As with other ‘peg’ terms, the most effective option may be to eliminate the term from one’s arguments altogether.  I consider the consequences for philosophy of science of such eliminativism vis-à-vis ‘scientific theory’.

Revised 10/25/10 - Copyright 2009