prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |review

It is clear a child’s progression through the school system is strongly related to socioeconomic status.  Children and youths from socioeconomically deprived areas generally have poorer educational outcomes than those from more affluent areas.  However, population-based data demonstrate that traditional methods of assessing the relationship between socioeconomic status and educational achievement profoundly underestimate its strength.  The traditional testing process misses all those who fall behind their classmates and all those who leave school. Hence, we consistently underestimate the handicaps associated with low socioeconomic status and fail to develop policies that enable children to overcome them.

 

Not all disadvantaged children do poorly; in fact, most of those who make it to Grade 12 to write the test pass.  The problem is that a large proportion of low-SES kids do not make it to Grade 12 on time or at all.

 

It should also be noted that the number of children with poor academic performance is not greatest in the most disadvantaged groups, but the lower-SES children are much less likely to recover from setbacks than children from higher-SES groups.