prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 | 25|26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |46 |47 |48 |49 |50 |51 |52 |53 |54 |55 |56 |57 |58 |59 |60 |61 |62  |63 |64 |65 |66 |review

Evidence of 'malpractice' can quickly come from Health-records in the public domain that have been recklessly discharged by unscrupulous and corrupt practitioners who have colluded with the govt (PPP schemes where the govt and sometimes Insurance companies pay poor patients for their intervention requirements using tax-payers money) and who are 100% confident that no one is going to read or make-sense of their corrupt dealings by a perusal of their paper-based records. 
 

We have such paper-based-health-records made available by us to everyone online in our non-standard-online-health-record platform (discharge summaries from certain Indian hospitals operating in the PPP mode) where the diagnosis is represented as something 'very-serious' and yet the records show normal investigation-reports that can never support the claim to that diagnosis. 


 

Then there are endoscopy reports of hiatus hernia with promises to the patient that he can get operated for it with the money taken from the govt and yet when we re-investigated we found no such hernia which could mean that the patient may have ended with a quick placebo-surgery and a nick to his abdominal skin in lieu of the tax-payers-money that would be pocketed by certain stakeholders from either side of the PPP? Disgusting to even think of it.

:-(